From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barth v. Borbe

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 9, 2021
2:20-cv-2202 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-2202 KJM KJN P

12-09-2021

SHAWN DAMON BARTH, Plaintiff, v. C/O BORBE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 29, 2021, plaintiff filed his amended complaint. However, his pleading stops midsentence on page 3 and is missing the “Claim 1 Supporting Facts Addendum.” (ECF No. 20, passim) The court is unable to screen the pleading without all of plaintiffs allegations. Therefore, plaintiff is granted additional time to submit the addendum or to file a complete amended complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the amended complaint be dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted twenty-one days from the date of this order in which to submit the “Claim 1 Supporting Facts Addendum” for interlineation into his pleading, or to file a complete amended complaint.


Summaries of

Barth v. Borbe

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 9, 2021
2:20-cv-2202 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Barth v. Borbe

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN DAMON BARTH, Plaintiff, v. C/O BORBE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 9, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-2202 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)