From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barth v. Borbe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 9, 2021
No. 2:20-cv-2202 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-2202 KJN P

06-09-2021

SHAWN DAMON BARTH, Plaintiff, v. C/O BORBE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By order filed April 29, 2021, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Barth v. Borbe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 9, 2021
No. 2:20-cv-2202 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Barth v. Borbe

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN DAMON BARTH, Plaintiff, v. C/O BORBE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

No. 2:20-cv-2202 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)