From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartelt v. Affymax, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 10, 2013
No. C 13-1025 PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 13-1025 PJH

05-10-2013

TRICIA M. BARTELT, Plaintiff, v. AFFYMAX, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiffs Frank Estrada and Christopher Sprute each having withdrawn his motion for appointment as lead plaintiff and for appointment of lead plaintiff's counsel, and plaintiff Tommy Jay Carter having previously moved for, among other things, appointment as lead plaintiff and for appointment of lead plaintiff's counsel, and having also requested entry of an order by the court granting that motion,

It is hereby Ordered that the parties shall, no later than May 17, 2013, submit a stipulated form of order, including the relief requested by plaintiff Carter in the response filed May 10, 2013, plus a schedule for filing the amended complaint and for defendants to respond to the amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bartelt v. Affymax, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 10, 2013
No. C 13-1025 PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Bartelt v. Affymax, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TRICIA M. BARTELT, Plaintiff, v. AFFYMAX, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

No. C 13-1025 PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)