Opinion
23-cv-10327
10-30-2024
CHRISTINE BARTEL, Plaintiff, v. OLA ELSAID, et al., Defendants.
ORDER DENYING (1) MOTION IN LIMINE SPECIFIC TO THIS HEARING (ECF NO. 64), AND (2) MOTION FOR PERJURY AND CONTEMPT BY DEFENDANT (ECF NO. 66)
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Now before the Court are two motions filed by Plaintiff Christine Bartel. (See ECF Nos. 64, 66.) The motions are identified in the caption above. The Court concludes that the motions may be decided without oral argument. See Local Rule 7.1(f)(2). The Court is not persuaded that Bartel is entitled to the relief she seeks in the pending motions. Accordingly, Bartel's motions (ECF Nos. 64, 66) are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on October 30, 2024, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.