From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barry/Dave/Glenn, Inc. v. Salkowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 1992
181 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 16, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.).


Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

An appeal to the Appellate Division may be taken as of right from a final or interlocutory judgment (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [1]), or from an order deciding a motion made upon notice (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; see, Delloiaco v City of New York, 174 A.D.2d 705; Blasie v County of Westchester, 169 A.D.2d 697; Arslanian v Volkswagen of Am., 121 A.D.2d 492; Cohalan v Johnson Elec. Constr. Corp., 105 A.D.2d 770). However, the order appealed from did not decide a motion made upon notice. No application has been made for permission to appeal. In view of the foregoing, the appeals are dismissed (see, CPLR 5701 [c]). In light of this disposition, we do not pass on the merits of the appellants' arguments. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barry/Dave/Glenn, Inc. v. Salkowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 1992
181 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Barry/Dave/Glenn, Inc. v. Salkowitz

Case Details

Full title:BARRY/DAVE/GLENN, INC., Doing Business as SPORTS CONNECTION HEALTH FITNESS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
581 N.Y.S.2d 687

Citing Cases

Valerio v. Doe

The order appealed from did not decide a motion made on notice and, as such, is not appealable as of right…

Valerio v. Doe

The order appealed from did not decide a motion made on notice and, as such, is not appealable as of right…