From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barry v. American Home Assurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 5, 1972
289 N.E.2d 180 (N.Y. 1972)

Opinion

Argued September 25, 1972

Decided October 5, 1972

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ALFRED M. ASCIONE, J.

Melvin I. Friedman and Gerald A. Robbie for appellant.

Patrick F. Foley for respondent.


Order affirmed, without costs (see Silver v. Great Amer. Ins. Co., 29 N.Y.2d 356). The defendant-respondent has stipulated — through counsel — that it will accept service of process in either Pennsylvania or Delaware, if the plaintiff elects to bring suit in one or the other of those jurisdictions, and that it will waive any defense based upon the Statute of Limitations.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

Barry v. American Home Assurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 5, 1972
289 N.E.2d 180 (N.Y. 1972)
Case details for

Barry v. American Home Assurance Company

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA J. BARRY, Appellant, v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 5, 1972

Citations

289 N.E.2d 180 (N.Y. 1972)
289 N.E.2d 180
337 N.Y.S.2d 259

Citing Cases

Neumeier v. Kuehner

The cases relied on by appellant are all distinguishable in that in none of them does it appear that there…

Gibson Greeting Cards v. Gateway Transp

The defendant has agreed to appear in any action started in the proper jurisdiction. The doctrine of forum…