From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrow v. City of Detroit Election Comm'n

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 30, 2013
495 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2013)

Opinion

Docket No. 147877. COA No. 317540.

2013-10-30

Tom BARROW, Plaintiff, and Citizens United Against Corrupt Government and D. Michelle White, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. CITY OF DETROIT ELECTION COMMISSION, City Clerk for the City of Detroit, Michael Duggan, and Michael Duggan for Mayor Committee, Defendants–Appellees.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented will cause a “delay in final adjudication ... likely to cause substantial harm” or that “the appeal is from a ruling that a provision of the Michigan Constitution, a Michigan statute, a rule or regulation included in the Michigan Administrative Code, or any other action of the legislative or executive branch of state government is invalid.” MCR 7.302(B)(4). The question of awarding costs is reserved until further order of the Court.


Summaries of

Barrow v. City of Detroit Election Comm'n

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 30, 2013
495 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2013)
Case details for

Barrow v. City of Detroit Election Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:Tom BARROW, Plaintiff, and Citizens United Against Corrupt Government and…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Oct 30, 2013

Citations

495 Mich. 884 (Mich. 2013)
838 N.W.2d 700