Opinion
No. 2006-10933.
December 18, 2007.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated September 7, 2006, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Heriberto A. Cabrera, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Joseph M. Dash of counsel), for appellant.
Epstein, Rayhill Frankini, Woodbury, N.Y. (Mona C. Haas of counsel), for respondents.
Before: Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants met their prima facie burden by establishing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident ( see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.