From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barron v. Barron

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Aug 2, 2016
NO. 01-16-00175-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 01-16-00175-CV

08-02-2016

MARTHA BARRON, Appellant v. FERNANDO BARRON, Appellee


On Appeal from the 312th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2012-27372

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Martha Barron has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015); Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.


Summaries of

Barron v. Barron

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Aug 2, 2016
NO. 01-16-00175-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Barron v. Barron

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA BARRON, Appellant v. FERNANDO BARRON, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Aug 2, 2016

Citations

NO. 01-16-00175-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2016)