From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrino v. Collins

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Oct 26, 2009
Civil Action No. 09 2042 (D.D.C. Oct. 26, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09 2042.

October 26, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff's pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint upon a determination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

Plaintiff, a resident of Hyattsville, Maryland, sues three employees of "Cable Network News" and a member of the United States Air Force "on grounds of conspiracy [sic] to commit extortion, conspircy [sic] to commit physocolocial [sic] damages-distress and mental anuguish [sic]. . . ." Compl. at 2. The rambling complaint consists of a series of illogical statements and a demand for damages exceeding $60 trillion. Complaints that describe fantastic or delusional scenarios or contain "fanciful factual allegation[s]" are subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); accord Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). This complaint qualifies for such treatment and, thus, is dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.


Summaries of

Barrino v. Collins

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Oct 26, 2009
Civil Action No. 09 2042 (D.D.C. Oct. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Barrino v. Collins

Case Details

Full title:Tony Curtis Barrino, Plaintiff, v. Heidi Collins et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Oct 26, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09 2042 (D.D.C. Oct. 26, 2009)