From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barringer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 13, 1978
362 So. 2d 166 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 77-904.

September 13, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Harry W. Fogle, J.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and Thomas A. McDonald, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant was charged with two counts of burglary, possession of marijuana and sale of marijuana. He pleaded guilty to the charges and was sentenced to a single general sentence of four years. The trial judge did not specify whether the sentence was predicated upon one, some, or all of the charges.

The imposition of a single judgment and sentence upon a defendant lawfully found guilty of two or more separate crimes is improper. See Dorfman v. State, 351 So.2d 954 (Fla. 1977).

Although the possession and sale conviction arose out of a single transaction, a separate sentence should be imposed upon each. See Fundak v. State, 358 So.2d 1195 (Fla.2d DCA 1978). A separate sentence should also be imposed upon each of the burglary charges.

The cause is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

GRIMES, C.J., and SCHEB, J., concur.


Summaries of

Barringer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 13, 1978
362 So. 2d 166 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Barringer v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH JAMES BARRINGER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 13, 1978

Citations

362 So. 2d 166 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Barringer v. State

This court reversed in an earlier appeal because the single sentence imposed for sale and possession was an…