From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barriga v. Cates

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 12, 2022
2:21-cv-07430 VBF (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-07430 VBF (AFM)

08-12-2022

JOSE ANTONIO ROJAS BARRIGA, Petitioner, v. B. CATES, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING HABEAS PETITION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

HON. VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the file and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed, and Objections have not been received.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that:

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.

The motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

The habeas corpus petition is DENIED.

This action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

The Court will rule on a certificate of appealability by separate order.

As required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 58(a), final judgment consistent with this Order and with the R&R shall be entered as a separate document.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barriga v. Cates

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 12, 2022
2:21-cv-07430 VBF (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Barriga v. Cates

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ANTONIO ROJAS BARRIGA, Petitioner, v. B. CATES, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 12, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-07430 VBF (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2022)