From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrier v. Grays Harbor Cnty. Prosecutors Office

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 5, 2023
3:23-cv-05793 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 5, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-cv-05793

12-05-2023

DARYL LEE BARRIER, Plaintiff, v. GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Jamal N. Whitehead United States District Judge

On October 19, 2023, the Honorable Michelle Peterson, U.S. Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Washington, issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's case without prejudice for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Dkt. No. 5. No one has objected to the R&R and the time for objecting has passed. See generally Dkt.

Based on its review of the R&R and the remaining record, the Court finds and ORDERS as follows:

1. The Court adopts the R&R (Dkt. No. 5) and enters the Proposed Judgement (Dkt. No. 5-2).

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to state a cognizable claim for relief.

3. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to the Hon. Michelle Peterson.


Summaries of

Barrier v. Grays Harbor Cnty. Prosecutors Office

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 5, 2023
3:23-cv-05793 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Barrier v. Grays Harbor Cnty. Prosecutors Office

Case Details

Full title:DARYL LEE BARRIER, Plaintiff, v. GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 5, 2023

Citations

3:23-cv-05793 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 5, 2023)