Barrick v. Newman

Full title: ROBERT A. BARRICK, Plaintiff, v. DR. WILLIAM NEWMAN, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 24, 2006

Civil Action No. 05-1545 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 24, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-1545.

March 24, 2006

ORDER

ARTHUR SCHWAB, District Judge

AND NOW, this 24^th day of March, 2006, after the plaintiff, Robert A. Barrick, filed a civil rights complaint in the above-captioned case, and after a motion to dismiss the complaint was submitted by the remaining defendants, NaphCare and John Walton, and after a motion for summary judgment was filed by the plaintiff, after a Report and Recommendation was issued by the United States Magistrate Judge, and the parties were granted ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the plaintiff, and after independent review of the pleadings, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the complaint filed by defendants NaphCare and John Walton (Docket No. 24) is granted, and that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 31) is dismissed as moot.