Opinion
No. 79652
05-14-2020
Parsons Behle & Latimer/Reno Parsons Behle & Latimer/Salt Lake City Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP/Las Vegas Robison, Sharp, Sullivan & Brust
Parsons Behle & Latimer/Reno
Parsons Behle & Latimer/Salt Lake City
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP/Las Vegas
Robison, Sharp, Sullivan & Brust
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion for summary judgment. Having considered the parties’ arguments and appendices filed in this matter, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.160 ; State ex rel. Dep’t of Transp. v. Thompson , 99 Nev. 358, 662 P.2d 1338 (1983) (observing that this court generally will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions for summary judgment); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist . Court , 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.