From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barretti v. Solucorp Indus., Ltd.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 9, 2013
102 A.D.3d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-01-9

Philip BARRETTI, respondent, v. SOLUCORP INDUSTRIES, LTD., et al., appellants.

Condon & Associates, PLLC, Nanuet, N.Y. (Brian K. Condon of counsel), for appellants. Durkin & Durkin, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Robert S. Cosgrove of counsel), for respondent.


Condon & Associates, PLLC, Nanuet, N.Y. (Brian K. Condon of counsel), for appellants. Durkin & Durkin, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Robert S. Cosgrove of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to enforce a judgment of the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, dated February 11, 2010, which the plaintiff later filed in Rockland County pursuant to CPLR article 54, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Alfieri, J.), dated September 6, 2011, which denied their motion to vacate the judgment.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

“It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal” ( Gaffney v. Gaffney, 29 A.D.3d 857, 857, 815 N.Y.S.2d 259;see Civil v. Tae Hwa Sim, 65 A.D.3d 1074, 885 N.Y.S.2d 419;Fernald v. Vinci, 13 A.D.3d 333, 786 N.Y.S.2d 211). An appellant's record on appeal must contain all of the relevant papers that were before the Supreme Court ( see CPLR 5526 ; Cohen v. Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 A.D.3d 689, 833 N.Y.S.2d 623;Gaffney v. Gaffney, 29 A.D.3d at 857, 815 N.Y.S.2d 259;Fernald v. Vinci, 13 A.D.3d at 333, 786 N.Y.S.2d 211).

Here, the record on appeal is inadequate. The appellants have failed to include the order to show cause by which they moved to vacate the subject foreign judgment and any of the other related papers, including affirmations in support of and in opposition to the motion. These omissions render meaningful appellate review of the Supreme Court's determination virtually impossible ( see CPLR 5526; Cohen v. Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 A.D.3d at 690, 833 N.Y.S.2d 623;Gaffney v. Gaffney, 29 A.D.3d at 857, 815 N.Y.S.2d 259;Fernald v. Vinci, 13 A.D.3d at 333, 786 N.Y.S.2d 211). Accordingly, dismissal of the appeal from the order is the appropriate disposition ( see Cohen v. Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 A.D.3d at 690, 833 N.Y.S.2d 623).

SKELOS, J.P., HALL, ROMAN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barretti v. Solucorp Indus., Ltd.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 9, 2013
102 A.D.3d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Barretti v. Solucorp Indus., Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:Philip BARRETTI, respondent, v. SOLUCORP INDUSTRIES, LTD., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 9, 2013

Citations

102 A.D.3d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
956 N.Y.S.2d 900
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 54

Citing Cases

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Hounnou

The appellant has failed to include the order to show cause by which he moved to vacate his default in…

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Hounnou

The appellant has failed to include the order to show cause by which he moved to vacate his default in…