Opinion
555 20344/12.
03-22-2016
Kemar BARRETTE, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Albert VICENTE, Defendant–Respondent.
Belovin & Franzblau, LLP, Bronx (David A. Karlin of counsel), for appellant. Law Office of Lord Chester So, Jericho (Thomas Torto of counsel), for respondent.
Belovin & Franzblau, LLP, Bronx (David A. Karlin of counsel), for appellant.
Law Office of Lord Chester So, Jericho (Thomas Torto of counsel), for respondent.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered December 23, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record demonstrates that defendant, while driving in the center lane of the Grand Concourse, first saw plaintiff a “millisecond” before impact, when he was approximately one car length away from plaintiff. Defendant, who was traveling below the 30 mile per hour speed limit, swerved his car to the right, moving into the outermost lane of travel, avoiding full-on impact with plaintiff. However, the rear tire of defendant's car ran over plaintiff's foot. The record further shows that plaintiff was dressed in dark clothing from head to foot, was attempting to cross the Grand Concourse at night while outside of a crosswalk, and stepped directly in front of defendant's vehicle. Under these circumstances, dismissal of the complaint was warranted (see Ramirez v. Molina, 114 A.D.3d 540, 980 N.Y.S.2d 433 1st Dept.2014 ).
SWEENY, J.P., RENWICK, MOSKOWITZ, GISCHE, JJ., concur.