Opinion
Argued June 15, 1891
Decided June 23, 1891
Richard O'Gorman, Jr., for appellant.
James A. Seaman for respondents.
Per Curiam opinion for reversal.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Barrett v. Smith
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 23, 1891
28 N.E. 23 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Barrett v. Smith
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 23, 1891
28 N.E. 23 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Barrett v. Smith
Case Details
Full title:ANNIE BARRETT, an Infant, by her Guardian ad litem, Appellant, v . GEORGE…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 23, 1891
Citations
28 N.E. 23 (N.Y. 1891)
28 N.E. 23
38 N.Y. St. Rptr. 922
Citing Cases
Britton v. State
J. F. Bullard, testifying for the state, stated: "My name is J. F. Bullard; I am 62 years of age, and have…
San Antonio Traction Co. v. UpsonTo make out his case, the appellee was not required to prove both grounds of negligence. Proof of either was…