From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrett v. Foley

United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio
Jul 26, 2021
1:19-cv-1472 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 26, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-1472

07-26-2021

Jonathan Barrett, Petitioner v. Warden Keith J. Foley, Respondent


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Jeffrey J. Helmick, United States District Judge

Before me is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. filed on March 29, 2021. (Doc. No. 6). Under the relevant statute:

Within [fourteen (14)] days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived.
United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628, 631-32 (6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (effective Dec. 1, 2009); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2). In this case, the fourteen-day window for objections has elapsed, and no objections have been filed.

Following review of Judge Baughman's R & R, I adopt it in its entirety as the Order of the Court. Because Petitioner's § 2254 habeas petition is untimely and cannot be saved by either statutory or equitable tolling, Respondent's motion to dismiss is granted. (Doc. No. 5).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Barrett v. Foley

United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio
Jul 26, 2021
1:19-cv-1472 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Barrett v. Foley

Case Details

Full title:Jonathan Barrett, Petitioner v. Warden Keith J. Foley, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio

Date published: Jul 26, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-1472 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 26, 2021)