From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrett v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
May 14, 1965
390 S.W.2d 654 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965)

Opinion

May 14, 1965.

Appeal from the Lee Circuit Court, J.M. Wolfinbarger, J.

Buford A. Short, Short Rose, Beattyville, for appellant.

Robert Matthews, Atty. Gen., John B. Browning, David Murrell, Asst. Attys. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.


Appellant was convicted of unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquor under KRS 242.230. He contends he was entitled to a directed verdict because of the failure of proof.

Five one-gallon jars of moonshine whisky were found buried 150 feet behind appellant's house on property not owned by him but which he had at times used for gardening purposes. There was no other evidence connecting him with this liquor, although his reputation was shown to be bad.

The Commonwealth undertakes to distinguish Lorman v. Commonwealth, Ky., 269 S.W.2d 243; McBride v. Commonwealth, Ky., 279 S.W.2d 772; and Powell v. Commonwealth, Ky., 282 S.W.2d 340. They are not distinguishable in principle. This circumstantial evidence of possession was insufficient to support the verdict.

The motion for appeal is sustained and the judgment is reversed for consistent proceedings.


Summaries of

Barrett v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
May 14, 1965
390 S.W.2d 654 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965)
Case details for

Barrett v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Harrison BARRETT, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: May 14, 1965

Citations

390 S.W.2d 654 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965)

Citing Cases

Melton v. Commonwealth

The contraband liquor was located on the other side of a creek which is approximately 120 feet from Melton's…

Marcum v. Commonwealth

When liquor is discovered on premises not owned by the accused there must be some evidence of substance…