From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrett v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 23, 2011
Case No. 1:09-cv-01741 LJO JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-01741 LJO JLT (PC)

09-23-2011

ROBERT E. BARRETT, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT MCGINNIS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

On February 25, 2011, the United States Marshal returned the process directed to Defendant McGinnis unserved. (Doc. 21.) The Court therefore ordered Plaintiff to provide further information on where Defendant McGinnis could be served. (Doc. 22.) In response, on April 22, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion for assistance from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation in locating Defendant McGinnis. (Doc. 30.) The Court granted the motion on June 1, 2011. (Doc. 35.) However, as of the date of this order, there has been no indication that the Legal Affairs Division has been able to locate Defendant McGinnis.

In addition, on June 6, 2011, counsel for Defendants filed a declaration outlining Defendants' attempts at identifying and locating Defendant McGinnis. (Doc. 37.) According to the declaration, counsel personally spoke with the current Chief Medical Officer of California Medical Facility, and the Chief Medical Officer indicated that there has been no medical provider named McGinnis at the facility since 1993. (Id. at ¶ 5.) Further, counsel has reviewed Plaintiff's medical records and has been unable to find any medical record containing the name McGinnis. (Id. at ¶ 8.)

In light of the foregoing, it appears that Plaintiff has misidentified this defendant. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why Defendant McGinnis should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Barrett v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 23, 2011
Case No. 1:09-cv-01741 LJO JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Barrett v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. BARRETT, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 23, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:09-cv-01741 LJO JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)