From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BARRETT v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 23, 2011
Case No. 1:09-cv-01741 LJO JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-01741 LJO JLT (PC).

May 23, 2011


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR DEPOSITION BY VIDEO CONFERENCING (Doc. 33)


On May 19, 2011, Defendants filed a request seeking permission to conduct the deposition of Plaintiff by videoconferencing pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4). Defendants explain that the institution of Plaintiff's incarceration is approximately 359.95 miles away from the office of Defendants' counsel and that videoconferencing would thus eliminate unnecessary travel expenses.

Good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' May 19, 2011 request for deposition by videoconferencing (Doc. 33) is GRANTED. Nothing in this order, however, shall be construed as requiring the institution of Plaintiff's incarceration to obtain video conferencing equipment if it is not already available for this purpose.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2011


Summaries of

BARRETT v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 23, 2011
Case No. 1:09-cv-01741 LJO JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2011)
Case details for

BARRETT v. CATE

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E BARRETT, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 23, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:09-cv-01741 LJO JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2011)