From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrett v. Brumfield

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
21-cv-06802-HSG (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-06802-HSG

12-20-2021

JOSEPH ANTHONY BARRETT, Plaintiff, v. BRUMFIELD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION RE: DKT. NO. 9

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Good cause being shown, Defendants' request for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion is GRANTED. Dkt. No. 9. By March 23, 2022, Defendants shall file their dispositive motion. Plaintiffs opposition to the dispositive motion must be filed with the Court and served upon Defendants no later than 28 days from the date the motion is filed. Defendants shall file a reply brief in support of their dispositive motion no later than 14 days after the date the opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No. hearing will be held on the motion.

This order terminates Dkt. No. 9.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barrett v. Brumfield

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
21-cv-06802-HSG (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Barrett v. Brumfield

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH ANTHONY BARRETT, Plaintiff, v. BRUMFIELD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

21-cv-06802-HSG (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)