From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrett v. Belleque

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Sep 4, 2007
Civil No. 06-876-JE (D. Or. Sep. 4, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-876-JE.

September 4, 2007


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Jelderks referred to this court a Findings and Recommendation in this action [42]. The Findings and Recommendation recommends that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [27] be granted, and that plaintiffs Motions for Summary Judgment [18] and for a Preliminary Injunction [8] be denied.

The matter is now before this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). See also Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Court, 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court has examined the pending motion and the underlying record. The Findings and Recommendation is, therefore, adopted. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [42] is granted, and plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment [18] and for a Preliminary Injunction [8] are denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barrett v. Belleque

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Sep 4, 2007
Civil No. 06-876-JE (D. Or. Sep. 4, 2007)
Case details for

Barrett v. Belleque

Case Details

Full title:JACOB BARRETT, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN BELLEQUE, A. BALES, RANDY GEER, JANE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Sep 4, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 06-876-JE (D. Or. Sep. 4, 2007)

Citing Cases

Barrett v. Workman

The court disagrees. Plaintiff claims the dismissal in Barrett v. Belleque, No. Civ. 06-876-JE (D. Or. Sept.…