From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrett Firearms Mfg. v. Flores

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Aug 19, 2022
No. 04-22-00136-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 19, 2022)

Opinion

04-22-00136-CV

08-19-2022

BARRETT FIREARMS MANUFACTURING, INC., Barrett Firearms USA, Inc., and Federal Cartridge Company, Appellants v. Xavier FLORES, Appellees


From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020-CI-17551 Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On July 27, 2022, appellant Federal Cartridge Company filed a "Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Anthony M. Pisciotti and Danny C. Lallis." In the motion, Pisciotti and Lallis request permission from this court to appear pro hac vice to serve as appellate co-counsel for Federal Cartridge Company. The motion, however, does not comply with Rule 19(b) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar of Texas because it is not accompanied "by [a] motion of the resident practicing Texas attorney with whom the non-resident attorney[s] will be associated in the proceeding." Accordingly, we deny the motion without prejudice to refiling with the required motion in support.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barrett Firearms Mfg. v. Flores

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Aug 19, 2022
No. 04-22-00136-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Barrett Firearms Mfg. v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:BARRETT FIREARMS MANUFACTURING, INC., Barrett Firearms USA, Inc., and…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Aug 19, 2022

Citations

No. 04-22-00136-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 19, 2022)