From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barreto v. Oberlander

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 15, 2024
Civil Action 22-CV-1018 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-CV-1018

08-15-2024

AXEL BARRETO, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT OBERLANDER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE

NOW, this 15th day of August 2024, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1), the response to the Petition (ECF No. 19), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (ECF No. 28), and no objections to the Report and Recommendation having been filed, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

3. No certificate of appealability shall issue because the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).


Summaries of

Barreto v. Oberlander

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 15, 2024
Civil Action 22-CV-1018 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Barreto v. Oberlander

Case Details

Full title:AXEL BARRETO, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT OBERLANDER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 15, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 22-CV-1018 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2024)