From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barr v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jan 18, 2000
14 S.W.3d 148 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED 76026

OPINION FILED: January 18, 2000 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 22, 2000 Application for Transfer Denied April 25, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY, DENNIS M. SCHAUMANN.

Emmett D. Queener, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen Pope Butler, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.



ORDER


Timothy Barr (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would serve no precedential or jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Barr v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jan 18, 2000
14 S.W.3d 148 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Barr v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY BARR, APPELLANT, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Jan 18, 2000

Citations

14 S.W.3d 148 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)