From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BARR v. GEE

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Apr 15, 2010
CASE NO: 8:10-cv-430-T-23EAJ (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO: 8:10-cv-430-T-23EAJ.

April 15, 2010


ORDER


The defendants David Gee, Paul Fitts, Kristy Udagawa, and Craig Latimer's request (Doc. 34) for an extension of time is GRANTED, and the motion (Doc. 35) to dismiss is deemed timely. The pro se plaintiff's motion (Doc. 33) for entry of default and default judgment is DENIED because no defendant is in default. Additionally, on or before Monday, April 26, 2010, the plaintiff shall show cause in writing why the defendant Hillsborough County Housing and Community Code Enforcement's motion (Doc. 9) to dismiss should not be granted as unopposed. Failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action without further notice.

See Local Rule 3.01(b) ("Each party opposing a motion or application shall file within fourteen (14) days after service of the motion or application a response that includes a memorandum of legal authority in opposition to the request, all of which the respondent shall include in a document not more than twenty (20) pages.") A copy of the Local Rules is available on the court's website at www.flmd.uscourts.gov.

ORDERED in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

BARR v. GEE

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Apr 15, 2010
CASE NO: 8:10-cv-430-T-23EAJ (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2010)
Case details for

BARR v. GEE

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED BARR, Plaintiff, v. DAVID GEE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Apr 15, 2010

Citations

CASE NO: 8:10-cv-430-T-23EAJ (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2010)