Opinion
No. 00-849-AS
August 20, 2001
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas filed his Findings and Recommendation on July 20, 2001. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. V. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); see also, Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly, I ADOPT the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 38) that defendant's motion (doc. 14) for summary judgment be GRANTED with regard to plaintiffs First, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Claims for Relief, and be DENIED with regard to plaintiffs Second Claim for Relief for Battery.
IT IS SO ORDERED.