From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnwell v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 9, 1975
50 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

December 9, 1975


Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered May 21, 1975, denying plaintiff's motion for an order removing the action from Civil Court, Bronx County, to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, and for leave to serve an amended complaint with an increased ad damnum clause, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and in the interest of justice, and the motion granted, without costs and without disbursements. Plaintiff was injured in 1973 and the action commenced in November of that year in the Civil Court, Bronx County. On February 13, 1975, the Workmen's Compensation Board found a permanent percentage loss in the use of plaintiff's hand and issued a decision on February 19 confirming its finding. One week later, the instant motion was made. There was a rational basis for the delay in making the motion, and it was supported by a physician's affidavit. The defendant is not unfairly prejudiced, and the explanation for delay is satisfactory. (Galarza v Alcoa S.S. Co., 34 A.D.2d 907.)

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, Kupferman, Capozzoli and Lynch, JJ.


Summaries of

Barnwell v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 9, 1975
50 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Barnwell v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York

Case Details

Full title:LEO BARNWELL, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 9, 1975

Citations

50 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Matter of Jackson v. Millar Elevator Indus

Although four years have elapsed between the Civil Court complaint and the petition for removal, a sufficient…