From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnicle v. Mellanox Technologies, Ltd.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 18, 2014
13-cv-04909-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2014)

Opinion

13-cv-04909-JD

08-18-2014

PATRICK BARNICLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MELLANOX TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING PREPARATION OF SUPPLEMENTAL CHART

JAMES DONATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Lead Plaintiffs are ordered to prepare a chart of the information required by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(b)(1) and (2) that specifically identifies: (1) each statement alleged to have been false or misleading, (2) the reason(s) the statement was false or misleading when made, and (3) if an allegation regarding the statement or omission is made on information and belief, all facts on which the belief is formed.

The chart should clearly identify which statements or omissions are attributable to which defendants, and include a detailed statement of the facts giving rise to a strong inference that each defendant acted with the required state of mind.

Plaintiffs should also summarize their allegations regarding what each defendant knew with regard to the statement or omission, and when each knew it.

For the guidance of Lead Plaintiffs, the Court suggests the format on the following page:

Statement No.

The Speaker(s), Date(s), and Medium

False and Misleading Statements

Reasons Why Statements Were False and Misleading When Made

Facts Giving Rise to a Strong Inference of Scienter

1

When: xx/xx/xxxx Where: Press release dated xx/xx/xxxx Speakers: CEO (Compl. ¶ __)

[This column should contain direct quotations of the allegedly false and misleading statements.]

[This column should summarize plaintiffs' arguments on falsity, with specific paragraph references to the complaint.]

[This column should summarize plaintiffs' arguments on scienter, with specific paragraph references to the complaint.]

Lead Plaintiffs are to submit this chart at the hearing on August 20, 2014. The chart must strictly adhere to the allegations in the second amended complaint, and cannot include any new or supplemental information or explanation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barnicle v. Mellanox Technologies, Ltd.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 18, 2014
13-cv-04909-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Barnicle v. Mellanox Technologies, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK BARNICLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MELLANOX TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., et…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 18, 2014

Citations

13-cv-04909-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2014)