Opinion
Case No. C09-5527RBL.
November 18, 2009
ORDER
THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Plaintiff's Objection [Dkt. #26] to the Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel [Dkt. #21]. Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court finds and rules as follows:
This matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), the non-dispositive order of a Magistrate Judge to whom the matter has been referred may be reviewed by the District Court upon the objection of a party. Plaintiff objects to the Magistrate Judge's Order denying his requests for the appointment of counsel.
Plaintiff's objection is not well-taken. This Court's review of plaintiff's motion clearly reveals that plaintiff is not entitled to the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff's Objection [Dkt. #26] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing pro se.