From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnhart v. Wingard

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Aug 23, 2017
No. 46 WM 2017 (Pa. Aug. 23, 2017)

Opinion

No. 46 WM 2017

08-23-2017

LEELAND BARNHART, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDANT [SIC] WINGARD (S.C.I. SOMERSET): PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA (A.D.A. BRIANA VANATA), Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.


Summaries of

Barnhart v. Wingard

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Aug 23, 2017
No. 46 WM 2017 (Pa. Aug. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Barnhart v. Wingard

Case Details

Full title:LEELAND BARNHART, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDANT [SIC] WINGARD (S.C.I…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 23, 2017

Citations

No. 46 WM 2017 (Pa. Aug. 23, 2017)