From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnette v. Tucker

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jun 29, 2021
3:19cv4743-MCR-EMT (N.D. Fla. Jun. 29, 2021)

Opinion

3:19cv4743-MCR-EMT

06-29-2021

DUSTIN LEE BARNETTE, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT P. TUCKER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on May 20, 2021. ECF No. 45. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 45, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Tucker, Cade, Cox, and Kinka, ECF No. 42, is GRANTED and judgment is entered in their favor.
3. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Upton are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to effect service of process, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. P. 4(m).
4. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close this case.


Summaries of

Barnette v. Tucker

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jun 29, 2021
3:19cv4743-MCR-EMT (N.D. Fla. Jun. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Barnette v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:DUSTIN LEE BARNETTE, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT P. TUCKER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

3:19cv4743-MCR-EMT (N.D. Fla. Jun. 29, 2021)