From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnett v. U.S. Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 13, 2013
537 F. App'x 281 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1604

08-13-2013

EARL BARNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Department of Justice; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants - Appellees.

Earl Barnett, Appellant Pro Se. Jarod James Douglas, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00203-IMK-JSK) Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl Barnett, Appellant Pro Se. Jarod James Douglas, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Earl Barnett appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge as modified and granting Defendants' motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, and dismissing Barnett's employment discrimination action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barnett v. U.S. Attorney Gen., No. 1:11-cv-00203-IMK-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Barnett v. U.S. Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 13, 2013
537 F. App'x 281 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Barnett v. U.S. Attorney Gen.

Case Details

Full title:EARL BARNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Department…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 13, 2013

Citations

537 F. App'x 281 (4th Cir. 2013)