From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnett v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Sep 30, 2015
Case: 1:15-cv-01614 (D.D.C. Sep. 30, 2015)

Opinion

Case: 1:15-cv-01614

09-30-2015

Terenece J. Barnett, Plaintiff, v. United States of America et al., Defendants.


Assigned To : Howell, Beryl A.
Assign. Date : 10/1/2015
Description: Pro Se Gen. Civil (I Deck)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff's pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed in part pursuant to the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Under that statute, the court is required to dismiss a complaint, or any portion of the complaint, upon determining that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seeks monetary relief from an immune defendant. Id. § 1915A(b).

Plaintiff is a federal prisoner who seeks to correct records maintained by the Bureau of Prisons. See Compl. Attachments. In addition, plaintiff seeks money damages for false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and other causes based on events that might be separate from his current incarceration. Plaintiff names as one of the defendants Chief Judge Lee Satterfield of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, but the allegations against this defendant are based on decisions Judge Satterfield made in his judicial capacity. See Compl. at 4. Judges are absolutely immune from lawsuits arising from such acts. See Mirales v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12 (1991); Thanh Vong Hoai v. Superior Court for District of Columbia, 344 Fed. Appx. 620 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (per curiam); Sindram v. Suda, 986 F.2d 1459, 1460 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the complaint against Chief Judge Lee Satterfield is DISMISSED with prejudice; it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall open this matter as brought under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and then randomly assign the case to a district judge for further proceedings. A separate order granting plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis will issue contemporaneously. Date: Sep. 30, 2015

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Barnett v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Sep 30, 2015
Case: 1:15-cv-01614 (D.D.C. Sep. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Barnett v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Terenece J. Barnett, Plaintiff, v. United States of America et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Sep 30, 2015

Citations

Case: 1:15-cv-01614 (D.D.C. Sep. 30, 2015)