Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, and in order to meet the constitutional requirements for an arraignment the defendant must be brought before the Court and the indictment read to him and he be given a chance to plead guilty or not guilty before the jury is impanelled. Woodard v. State, 42 Ala. App. 552, 171 So.2d 462, 14 Am.Jur. — Criminal Law, Sec. 249; State v. Walton, 13 L.R.A. (WS) 811; Howard v. State, 165 Ala. 18, 50 So. 954; Code of 1940, Title 15, Sec. 278-288. Transportation of intoxicating liquors from one state through another state is within the protection of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution and such transportation is not subject to state interference, regardless of whether state to which liquor is being shipped prohibits sale or traffic in such liquors. Alcohol Div. of Dept. of Finance and Taxation of Tenn. v. State Ex Rel. Strawbridge; Ford v. State Ex Rel. Strawbridge; Lauderdale v. State Ex Rel. Strawbridge, 258 Ala. 384, 63 So.2d 358; Barnett v. State Ex Rel. Milner, 243 Ala. 410, 9 So.2d 267; Moragne v. State, 200 Ala. 689, 77 So. 322, L.R.A. 1918E, 948; Hill v. State, 27 Ala. App. 573, 176 So. 805; Howard Boyce Edison v. State Ex Rel. Arthur Burns, Solicitor, 263 Ala. 281, 82 So.2d 218. MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Charles H. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.