From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnett v. Schickerling Products Corp.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1933
168 A. 296 (N.J. 1933)

Opinion

Decided September 27th, 1933.

Appeal of William Harris.

On appeal from an order of the court of chancery.

Mr. Merritt Lane, for the complainant.

Mr. Henry Gottfried, Mr. Frederick J. Israel and Mr. Herbert L. Elins, for the defendant.


The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 112 N.J. Eq. 1. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Barnett v. Schickerling Products Corp.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1933
168 A. 296 (N.J. 1933)
Case details for

Barnett v. Schickerling Products Corp.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD H. BARNETT, complainant, v. SCHICKERLING PRODUCTS CORPORATION…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 27, 1933

Citations

168 A. 296 (N.J. 1933)
168 A. 296
114 N.J. Eq. 44

Citing Cases

Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Petchensky

National Bank v. White, 93 N.J. Eq. 109. So in foreclosure, the decree of foreclosure and the order…

Fid. Union Trust Co. v. Petchesky

National Bank v. White, 93 N.J. Eq. 109, 115 A. 533. So in foreclosure, the decree of foreclosure and the…