From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnett v. Lift

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Sep 5, 2024
5:24-cv-17-MTT-AGH (M.D. Ga. Sep. 5, 2024)

Opinion

5:24-cv-17-MTT-AGH

09-05-2024

RANDY DEWAYNE BARNETT, Plaintiff, v. Doctor CARL LIFT, Defendant.


ORDER

AMELIA G. HELMICK UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The record shows that Defendant was personally served with process by the United States Marshals Service on July 2, 2024 (ECF No. 15). Because Defendant was personally served but has not answered or otherwise defended within the period contemplated by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A)(i), the Clerk of Court is ORDERED to enter default against Defendant. The Clerk is also DIRECTED to serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant by U.S. Mail delivered to the available address of service, as well as the Warden of Hancock State Prison, located in Sparta, Georgia.

Plaintiff is ADVISED that after Defendant's default is entered on the record, Plaintiff may file a motion for the entry of default judgment against Defendant pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED and DIRECTED.


Summaries of

Barnett v. Lift

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Sep 5, 2024
5:24-cv-17-MTT-AGH (M.D. Ga. Sep. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Barnett v. Lift

Case Details

Full title:RANDY DEWAYNE BARNETT, Plaintiff, v. Doctor CARL LIFT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Sep 5, 2024

Citations

5:24-cv-17-MTT-AGH (M.D. Ga. Sep. 5, 2024)