From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnett v. Holbrook, Cabot Rollins Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

October, 1916.

Present — Clarke, P.J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Smith, JJ. McLaughlin, J., dissented on the ground that the plaintiff had the right to settle the cause of action, and the defendant had a right to serve without costs a supplemental answer showing that fact.


The order appealed from is modified by imposing as a condition of granting the motion the payment of taxable costs to date to the plaintiff, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant.


Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Order to be settled on notice.


Summaries of

Barnett v. Holbrook, Cabot Rollins Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Barnett v. Holbrook, Cabot Rollins Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ENOCH BARNETT, Appellant, v . HOLBROOK, CABOT ROLLINS CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1916

Citations

175 App. Div. 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)