From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnett v. Gipson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 25, 2024
CV 20-00409 MEMF (KS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2024)

Opinion

CV 20-00409 MEMF (KS)

09-25-2024

BRIAN KEITH BARNETT, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MAAME EWUSI-MENSAH FRIMPONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Amended Complaint, the May 22, 2024 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and all records herein. The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed and no Objections have been filed with the Court. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and under Local Rule 41-6.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barnett v. Gipson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 25, 2024
CV 20-00409 MEMF (KS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Barnett v. Gipson

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN KEITH BARNETT, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 25, 2024

Citations

CV 20-00409 MEMF (KS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2024)