From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnett v. Gastelo

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 14, 2022
2:22-cv-04070-RGK-JDE (C.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-04070-RGK-JDE

09-14-2022

DELBERT R. BARNETT, Plaintiff, v. JOSIE GASTELO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

R. GARY KLAUSNER, United States District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, including the Complaint (Dkt. 1) filed by Delbert R. Barnett (“Plaintiff”); Plaintiff's Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees (Dkt. 2, “IFP Request”); the Order re Plaintiff's Complaint issued by the assigned Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 5); the First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff (Dkt. 6); the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 8, “Report”); and Plaintiff's Objections to the Report (Dkt. 9). The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 6) is DISMISSED;
2. The IFP Request (Dkt. 2) is DENIED; and
3. Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barnett v. Gastelo

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 14, 2022
2:22-cv-04070-RGK-JDE (C.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Barnett v. Gastelo

Case Details

Full title:DELBERT R. BARNETT, Plaintiff, v. JOSIE GASTELO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 14, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-04070-RGK-JDE (C.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2022)