Barnett v. Barnett

Full title: Cheri Barnett, Plaintiff, v. Barry Barnett, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jul 13, 2006

Case No. 1:05cv679 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 13, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:05cv679.

July 13, 2006

ORDER

MICHAEL BARRETT, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed June 16, 2006 (Doc. 14).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. This matter is REMANDED in part to the Clermont County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, for disposition of Plaintiff's Motion to Modify or Vacate the Qualified Domestic Relations Order. The Motion to Intervene by Pamela Barnett (Doc. 8) is GRANTED.

This action is administratively closed pending the outcome of the state court proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.