From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnett Bk. v. Const. BK, Phila

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 23, 1995
658 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-889.

June 16, 1995. Rehearings Denied August 23, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County; C. McFerrin Smith, Judge.

F.A. Ford, Jr., and Richard S. Graham of Landis, Graham, French, Husfeld, Sherman Ford, P.A., DeLand, for appellant.

Raymond A. Biernacki, Jr., of Biernacki Bauer, P.A., DeLand, for appellees Powell and Leadbetter.

No Appearance for appellee Constitution Bank of Philadelphia.


AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

GRIFFIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.


I have to agree with appellant that it was error to give any legal effect to the failure of Barnett Bank to take a security interest in the personalty of the borrower as a defense to the bank's action on the guaranty — especially where the guarantors were also the borrowers! However, given the way Barnett chose to plead and prosecute its claim against the individual defendants and given the individual defendants' evidence as to value of the mortgaged property, this error does not matter.


Summaries of

Barnett Bk. v. Const. BK, Phila

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 23, 1995
658 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Barnett Bk. v. Const. BK, Phila

Case Details

Full title:BARNETT BANK OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, ETC., APPELLANT, v. CONSTITUTION BANK OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 23, 1995

Citations

658 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)