From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnes v. Timmons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01042-WJM-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01042-WJM-KMT

09-17-2012

JOHN T. BARNES, Plaintiff, v. ANGUS JEFFERY TIMMONS, JR., and OFFICER ANTHONY MORABIRO, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Defendant Timmons [sic] Motion for Stay and in the alternative, Motion for Exemption from the 26(f) Requirement of Telephone or Face to Face Communication with Plaintiff (Doc. No. 36, filed September 11, 2012) is GRANTED in part and TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT in part. To the extent that the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) scheduling/planning conference has not yet occurred, given the animosity between Plaintiff and Defendant Timmons, the scheduling/planning conference shall occur telephonically. Plaintiff may file a reply in support of his motion to the extent that it seeks to stay this case no later than September 24, 2012.


Summaries of

Barnes v. Timmons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01042-WJM-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Barnes v. Timmons

Case Details

Full title:JOHN T. BARNES, Plaintiff, v. ANGUS JEFFERY TIMMONS, JR., and OFFICER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 17, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01042-WJM-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 17, 2012)