From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnes v. Timmons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 18, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01042-WJM-KMT (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01042-WJM-KMT

10-18-2012

JOHN T. BARNES, Plaintiff, v. ANGUS JEFFERY TIMMONS, JR., and OFFICER ANTHONY MORABIRO, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Plaintiff’s “Motion for Restraining Order” (Doc. No. 51, filed Oct. 4, 2012), which the court construes to seek a temporary restraining order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, is DENIED without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 7.1A's duty to confer. That rule, which applies to motions for temporary restraining orders, D.C.COLO.LCivR 65.1.A.2, states that

The court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter. The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule . . . .

D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. All parties are advised that any future motions that fail to comply with Local Rule 7.1A will be summarily denied.


Summaries of

Barnes v. Timmons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 18, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01042-WJM-KMT (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Barnes v. Timmons

Case Details

Full title:JOHN T. BARNES, Plaintiff, v. ANGUS JEFFERY TIMMONS, JR., and OFFICER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 18, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01042-WJM-KMT (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2012)