Opinion
2:21-cv-01649 JAM GGH P
12-20-2021
ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Petitioner, v. SUPREME COURT JUDGES, et al., Respondents.
ORDER
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 21, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 5. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 8.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 21, 2021, are adopted in full;
2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is summarily dismissed; and
3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.