From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnes v. Seigler

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 30, 2013
540 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-7053

2013-09-30

STEVEN LOUIS BARNES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREGORY WILLIAM SEIGLER; LT. MARK HOWARD, Defendants - Appellees.

Steven Louis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-01156-MBS) Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Louis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steven Louis Barnes appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Barnes' claims against Appellee Gregory William Seigler and granting summary judgment on Barnes' claims against Appellee Mark Howard in favor of Howard, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Seigler, No. 5:11-cv-01156-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2012; June 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Barnes v. Seigler

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 30, 2013
540 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Barnes v. Seigler

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN LOUIS BARNES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREGORY WILLIAM SEIGLER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 30, 2013

Citations

540 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2013)