From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnes v. Mercury

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Oct 18, 2012
NUMBER 13-11-00769-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 18, 2012)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00769-CV

10-18-2012

ESTEBANON BARNES AND SLESHIA NEAL, Appellants, v. EDDIE YAKLIN FORD LINCOLN MERCURY, LTD AND EDDIE YAKLIN F/L/M/, LTD D/B/A TRINITY ACCEPTANCE, Appellees.


On appeal from the 214th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Estebanon Barnes and Sleshia Neal, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 2011-DCV-0138-F. Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have resolved the issues in dispute. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Barnes v. Mercury

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Oct 18, 2012
NUMBER 13-11-00769-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Barnes v. Mercury

Case Details

Full title:ESTEBANON BARNES AND SLESHIA NEAL, Appellants, v. EDDIE YAKLIN FORD…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Oct 18, 2012

Citations

NUMBER 13-11-00769-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 18, 2012)