Barnes v. Ingram

3 Citing cases

  1. City of Chattanooga ex rel. Lepard v. Elec. Power Bd. of Chattanooga

    No. E2015-01995-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 20, 2016)   Cited 1 times

    1988)). Furthermore, "'[t]he provisions of the charter are mandatory, and must be obeyed by the city and its agents . . . .'" Allmand, 292 S.W.3d at 625 (quoting Barnes v. Ingram, 397 S.W.2d 821, 825 (Tenn. 1965) (in turn quoting Marshall & Bruce Co. v. City of Nashville, 71 S.W. 815, 819 (Tenn. 1903))).

  2. Jennings v. City of Memphis

    No. W2013-02570-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jul. 24, 2014)

    We must construe together the portions of both the Charter and the Code of Ordinances dealing with the same subject matter. See 421 Corp. v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville and Davidson County, 36 S.W.3d 469 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000); see also Barnes v. Ingram, 397 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tenn. 1966) (construing the Charter and Ordinances together); Posey, 164 S.W.3d at 576-77 (same). Article 7, Section 53 of the City Charter vests the Board of Commissioners with authority to establish a retirement or pension system for the officers and employees of the Fire Department and the Police Department and to determine who may be included as members of such system.

  3. City of Knoxville v. City of Knoxville Pension Bd.

    No. E2012-00703-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2012)   Cited 1 times
    In City of Knoxville v. City of Knoxville Pension Board, et al., No. E2012-00703-COA-R3-CV, 2012 WL 6477024, (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2012), this court addressed the issue of the City's standing pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. ยง 27-9-101 to seek certiorari review of a decision by its pension board which the city alleged exceeded the authority of the board and violated a city ordinance.

    The provisions of the Charter are mandatory and must be obeyed by the City and its agents. Barnes v. Ingram, 217 Tenn. 363, S.W.2d 821, 825 (Tenn. 1965).